How B2B Buyers Use ChatGPT in Research Phase

Your B2B buyer isn't Googling "best CRM software" anymore. They're asking ChatGPT: "Which CRM integrates with HubSpot and Salesforce, costs under $50/user/month, and has good API documentation?"

Gartner found that 61% of B2B buyers prefer rep-free purchase experiences. They're not avoiding sales because they hate salespeople - they're avoiding sales because AI tools give them better, faster answers.

Here's what that actually looks like in practice.

The Shift in B2B Research Behavior

Traditional B2B research path:

  1. Google search for broad category ("project management software")
  2. Read comparison articles
  3. Visit vendor sites
  4. Request demos
  5. Talk to sales

New B2B research path:

  1. Ask ChatGPT specific question ("project management tool for remote teams with Jira integration")
  2. Get 3-5 recommendations with reasoning
  3. Verify recommendations on vendor sites
  4. Self-serve trial or demo
  5. Talk to sales only when ready to buy

The difference: Buyers arrive at your site pre-qualified and already comparing you to specific alternatives. They've done 80% of research before you know they exist.

What this means for your content:

If ChatGPT doesn't cite you in initial research, you're not even in consideration. By the time the buyer visits your site directly, they've already formed opinions based on what AI tools told them about you.

The Five Types of B2B Research Queries

Based on analysis of B2B software buying patterns, here are the queries buyers actually use:

Query Type 1: Comparison Queries

Format: "[Tool A] vs [Tool B] for [use case]"

Examples:

  • "Asana vs Monday.com for engineering teams"
  • "Segment vs mParticle for B2B SaaS companies"
  • "Snowflake vs Databricks for data warehousing"

What buyers want:
Direct comparison on relevant dimensions (pricing, integrations, use cases). Not marketing language or feature lists - they want to know which tool is better for their specific situation.

How to optimize for these:

Create comparison pages with actual side-by-side data:

  • Feature parity tables
  • Pricing breakdowns
  • Integration lists
  • Use case recommendations ("Choose X if..." format)

Don't claim superiority on everything. Be honest about tradeoffs. LLMs cite content that acknowledges limitations because it signals trustworthiness.

What doesn't work:
"We're better at everything. We have more features, better support, lower pricing, and superior technology."

What does work:
"We're better for teams under 50 people because of our pricing model. For larger organizations with complex compliance needs, [Competitor] offers more enterprise features."

Query Type 2: Requirements Queries

Format: "[Tool category] with [specific requirements]"

Examples:

  • "CRM with native LinkedIn integration and API access"
  • "Analytics platform that supports BigQuery and has SQL query builder"
  • "Project management tool with Gantt charts and time tracking"

What buyers want:
To eliminate options that don't meet minimum requirements. They're filtering the market, not evaluating options yet.

How to optimize for these:

Have a comprehensive features/integrations page that LLMs can extract from:

  • List all integrations by name (not "50+ integrations")
  • Specify API capabilities explicitly ("REST API," "Webhooks," "OAuth 2.0")
  • Call out advanced features clearly ("Gantt charts," "Custom fields," "SSO")

Use structured data or very clear lists so LLMs can quickly verify if you meet requirements.

Query Type 3: Use Case Queries

Format: "Best [tool category] for [industry/team/situation]"

Examples:

  • "Best documentation tool for API-first companies"
  • "Best collaboration software for remote engineering teams"
  • "Best analytics platform for B2B SaaS startups"

What buyers want:
Social proof that you work for people like them. Not generic "trusted by thousands" - specific evidence you solve their exact problem.

How to optimize for these:

Create use case pages or case studies that include:

  • Industry-specific challenges you solve
  • Team size/type you work best for
  • Specific workflows or integrations for that use case
  • Customer examples (with names if possible)

Example structure:

"[Your tool] for Remote Engineering Teams

We built [feature] specifically for distributed teams. 200+ remote engineering teams use [Tool] to [specific outcome].

Key features for remote teams:

  • Async collaboration (no meetings required)
  • Timezone-aware notifications
  • GitHub/GitLab integration
  • Code review workflows

Customers: Zapier (300 remote engineers), GitLab (1,000+ remote team)"

Specificity beats generic positioning.

Query Type 4: Problem-Solution Queries

Format: "How to solve [specific problem]"

Examples:

  • "How to track API performance across multiple regions"
  • "How to manage customer data across Salesforce and HubSpot"
  • "How to automate security compliance reporting"

What buyers want:
Direct answers to technical problems. They're trying to understand if their problem is solvable, and if your category of tool solves it.

How to optimize for these:

Write documentation and blog content that directly answers the problem:

  • Start with the problem statement (not your product)
  • Explain the solution approach generically
  • Show how your product implements that solution
  • Include specific examples or code snippets

Example structure:

"How to Track API Performance Across Multiple Regions

The challenge: APIs deployed in multiple regions have different latency profiles. Traditional monitoring tools aggregate globally, hiding regional issues.

The solution: Per-region monitoring with automatic failover detection.

How [Tool] solves this:

  • Deploy monitoring nodes in each region (AWS, GCP, Azure)
  • Track latency at origin, not aggregated
  • Alert when regional variance exceeds threshold

Implementation:
[specific technical example]"

This format educates buyers while positioning your product as the implementation.

Query Type 5: Evaluation Queries

Format: "Is [tool] worth it" or "[tool] pros and cons"

Examples:

  • "Is Datadog worth it for small teams?"
  • "Snowflake pros and cons for B2B companies"
  • "Should we use Stripe or Braintree?"

What buyers want:
Honest assessment of whether your tool is right for them. They're in late-stage research and want validation before committing.

How to optimize for these:

Create honest content that addresses limitations:

  • "Who [Tool] is (and isn't) for" pages
  • Pricing justification ("When the price makes sense")
  • Alternative recommendations for buyers you're not right for

Example structure:

"Is [Tool] Worth It?

For teams that need [specific outcome], yes. Here's why:
[3-4 specific benefits with data]

When [Tool] isn't worth it:

  • Teams under 10 people (pricing doesn't scale down)
  • Companies without [required integration]
  • Organizations that need [feature we don't have]

Alternatives to consider:

  • For smaller teams: [Competitor A]
  • For [different use case]: [Competitor B]"

Counter-intuitive: Recommending alternatives when you're not a fit increases trust. LLMs cite this content more because it demonstrates expertise over salesmanship.

Real Query Examples from B2B Software Buyers

Here are actual (anonymized) queries from B2B buyers using ChatGPT during research:

Example 1: Technical Requirements
"Which customer data platform has the best data warehouse integration, supports reverse ETL, and has pre-built connectors for Salesforce and HubSpot?"

What the buyer is really asking:
"I need these three specific capabilities. Which vendors have all three?"

What gets cited:
Content that explicitly lists integrations and features. Generic "we integrate with everything" gets ignored.

Example 2: Buying Committee
"I need to present three API monitoring options to our VP of Engineering. What are the key differences between Datadog, New Relic, and Dynatrace for a 50-person engineering team?"

What the buyer is really asking:
"Give me a comparison I can present internally. I need to look informed."

What gets cited:
Side-by-side comparisons with pricing, deployment differences, and specific use case recommendations. Vendor sites that acknowledge competitors.

Example 3: Budget Constraints
"What's the best project management tool for under $1,000/month for a 30-person team?"

What the buyer is really asking:
"Which tools am I eligible for based on budget?"

What gets cited:
Transparent pricing pages. Content that explicitly states "$X per user per month" not "contact sales."

Example 4: Integration Requirements
"Does [Tool] work with our existing Slack, Jira, and GitHub setup?"

What the buyer is really asking:
"Will this fit into our current workflow?"

What gets cited:
Integration documentation that lists specific tools by name and describes what the integration does.

Example 5: Validation
"What do users say about [Tool]'s customer support response time?"

What the buyer is really asking:
"Is this vendor reliable?"

What gets cited:
Third-party reviews, case studies with quotes, support documentation that includes SLA commitments.

How B2B Buyers Actually Use AI Responses

Buyers don't take AI responses as final truth. They use them as starting points for further research.

The typical flow:

  1. Ask ChatGPT broad question
  2. Get 3-5 options with brief explanations
  3. Open vendor sites for the recommended options
  4. Cross-reference AI claims with actual vendor information
  5. If AI missed something important, ask follow-up questions
  6. Compile shortlist of 2-3 finalists

Critical insight:

If the buyer opens your site and finds that ChatGPT's summary was wrong or misleading, they lose trust in both the AI and your brand. Your site content needs to confirm and expand on what AI tools are saying about you.

Optimizing for AI-Mediated Research

To show up in these research queries:

Strategy 1: Create comparison content

Write your own comparison pages. Compare yourself honestly to top competitors. LLMs cite this because it's useful regardless of who wins the comparison.

Strategy 2: List integrations explicitly

Don't say "50+ integrations." List every major integration by name on a dedicated page. Buyers are searching for specific combinations.

Strategy 3: Be specific about pricing

If you can't list exact pricing, at least provide ranges or starting prices. "From $500/month" is infinitely better than "contact sales" for AI citations.

Strategy 4: Address use cases directly

Create content for every major buyer persona and industry. "For engineering teams," "For healthcare companies," "For remote organizations."

Strategy 5: Write honest assessments

Pages like "Who [Tool] is for" or "Is [Tool] right for you?" get cited heavily because they help buyers self-qualify.

Strategy 6: Update regularly

AI tools prefer recent content. If your comparison page is from 2021, it won't get cited in 2024 research queries.

What This Means for B2B Content Strategy

The shift to AI-mediated research changes content priorities:

Old priorities:

  • SEO keyword optimization
  • Conversion-focused landing pages
  • Gated content and lead capture
  • Generic "why us" messaging

New priorities:

  • AI citation optimization
  • Honest comparison content
  • Ungated educational resources
  • Specific use case positioning

Buyers are using AI tools to filter the market before they ever fill out a form. If you're not in the AI's initial recommendations, you don't get considered.

For more on creating content that AI tools cite, see "Answer Engine Optimization: The Definitive Guide". For understanding how to structure content for maximum clarity, check out "Content Clarity: The New SEO Metric".

The B2B buyer journey has changed. Adapt your content strategy to match how buyers actually research - with AI tools doing the heavy lifting before your site ever loads.

Subscribe to DiscoverdbyAI

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe